# Bounded reference audit

Assistant semantic audit against 27 expectations fixed before inference. Full requires the expected structured kind, supported description, correct binding and all specified qualifiers. Partial means a mention, related concept or incomplete representation. Absent can coexist with unrelated or invalid candidates. This is bounded reference coverage, not model precision, exhaustive recall or expert certification. No new facts were inserted to improve this score. Scope reductions are not counted as successful extraction.

| Reference | Raw | Curated | Reason |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| maintenance-01 | full | full | Aircraft is a source-backed maintained-object entity; c209 is the single retained aircraft concept after description correction. |
| maintenance-02 | partial | partial | Generic weight, example values or maximum takeoff glossary text do not establish the requested numeric aircraft maximum-weight field. |
| maintenance-03 | partial | partial | Report appears in descriptions and a wrong relationship; corrected revision record is a distinct but narrower related information object, not the expected report entity. |
| maintenance-04 | absent | absent | No supported report-to-equipment-list relationship. |
| maintenance-05 | absent | absent | No supported equipment-list weights and moment-arms fields. |
| maintenance-06 | absent | absent | The candidate on weighing does not preserve the privately-owned-and-operated applicability exception. |
| maintenance-07 | absent | absent | Cited responsibility fragment is truncated; no supported complete PIC responsibility candidate. |
| maintenance-08 | absent | absent | A different temporary-record retention statement does not establish the repair-station two-year rule. |
| maintenance-09 | incorrect | absent | Candidates conflate inspection types or describe IA renewal rather than annual-inspection authorisation. They are excluded. |
| redevelopment-01 | partial | full | Raw matrix descriptions are attached to document titles or table headings. Corrected c057 is the source-supported Implementation Matrix entity. |
| redevelopment-02 | partial | partial | Individual activities exist and curated descriptions preserve proposed status; no separate Actions entity is established. |
| redevelopment-03 | partial | partial | Matrix description refers to goals; no source-supported Actions-to-Goals relationship with endpoints is exported. |
| redevelopment-04 | partial | partial | Priority appears in a heading or matrix description, not a separately modelled action attribute. |
| redevelopment-05 | partial | partial | Timeline appears in a heading or matrix description, not a proposed-completion attribute. |
| redevelopment-06 | partial | partial | Partners are mentioned, but no general Actions-to-CollaboratingPartners relationship is supported and exported. |
| redevelopment-07 | partial | absent | Road and arboretum context appears, but the complete proposed route and minimum width are absent. |
| redevelopment-08 | absent | absent | No candidate represents short-term bike parking near illuminated conspicuous entrances. |
| redevelopment-09 | absent | absent | No candidate represents the one-tree-per-ten-parking-spaces plan guideline. |
| restoration-01 | partial | absent | City Park Lake is mentioned in descriptions or an invalid edge, not extracted as its own entity. |
| restoration-02 | partial | absent | Lake Erie is mentioned under the generic Baton Rouge Lakes name, not a distinct entity. |
| restoration-03 | partial | absent | Owner appears in a compound target; no distinct owner entity. |
| restoration-04 | partial | absent | BREC or its expanded name appears in invalid compound relationships, not a distinct entity. |
| restoration-05 | partial | absent | Ownership content is conflated with operation and binds a plan title to a compound target; endpoint closure fails. |
| restoration-06 | partial | absent | Maintenance is mentioned but park-space management is not represented separately from lake ownership. |
| restoration-07 | absent | absent | Access to the planning team does not represent the required three-party agreement or its subject matter. |
| restoration-08 | partial | absent | Depth candidate omits 3.5 feet and has a compound owner; not a supported site-condition field. |
| restoration-09 | partial | partial | Habitat or sanctuary is mentioned. The explicit combined fish-and-migratory-bird priority is not represented as the expected proposed activity. |

Raw full representations: 1/27. Curated full representations: 2/27. This confirms a semantic coverage failure and must not be presented as a successful complete business model.