{"items":[{"id":"service-acceptance-P01","label":"supported","source_units":["S04","S06"],"rationale":"S04 says the clock resumes from its prior elapsed value when the dispute resolves. S06 states M2 had accrued 7 payment days before the dispute and that the dispute has resolved. Together these entail resumption at 7 days."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P02","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S04","S06"],"rationale":"S04 explicitly requires resumption from the prior elapsed value, which S06 gives as 7 days, not zero. Restarting at zero is therefore negated."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P03","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S01","S02","S06"],"rationale":"S01 requires both a purchase order and signed acceptance for payment. S02 confirms that acceptance does not replace the purchase order. S06 states M2 has no purchase order. A stated requirement is therefore unmet, so M2 is not eligible for payment."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P04","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S03"],"rationale":"S03 explicitly says Accounts Payable may register acceptance but may not sign it. Only the named service owner may sign."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P05","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S05"],"rationale":"S05 explicitly states that a dispute on M2 does not pause M1."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P06","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S05"],"rationale":"S05 explicitly states that acceptance of M1 does not accept M2."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P07","label":"not_established","source_units":["S06"],"rationale":"S06 states that no payment due-day total is specified. The sources leave the total allowed payment time open, so a 30-day figure is neither entailed nor negated."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P08","label":"not_established","source_units":["S06"],"rationale":"S06 states that no automatic reminder channel is specified. The absence of a rule neither requires nor prohibits email."}]}