{"items":[{"id":"service-acceptance-P01","label":"supported","source_units":["S04","S06"],"rationale":"S04 states that a resolved dispute causes the payment clock to resume from its prior elapsed value, and S06 states that M2 had accrued 7 payment days before its dispute, which has now resolved."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P02","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S04","S06"],"rationale":"S04 specifies that the payment clock resumes from its prior elapsed value upon dispute resolution rather than restarting at zero, and S06 establishes that M2 had 7 prior accrued payment days."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P03","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S01","S02","S06"],"rationale":"S01 and S02 establish that payment requires both signed milestone acceptance and a purchase order, and S06 states that M2 has no purchase order."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P04","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S03"],"rationale":"S03 explicitly states that only the named service owner may sign acceptance and that Accounts Payable may not sign it."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P05","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S05"],"rationale":"S05 explicitly states that a dispute on M2 does not pause M1."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P06","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S05"],"rationale":"S05 explicitly states that acceptance of milestone M1 does not accept milestone M2."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P07","label":"not_established","source_units":["S06"],"rationale":"S06 explicitly notes that no payment due-day total is specified in the source documents, leaving a 30-day limit unestablished."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P08","label":"not_established","source_units":["S06"],"rationale":"S06 explicitly states that no automatic reminder channel is specified, so a requirement to use email is not established."}]}