{"items":[{"id":"service-acceptance-P01","label":"supported","source_units":["S04","S06"],"rationale":"S04 says the clock resumes from its prior elapsed value when the dispute resolves. S06 states M2 had accrued 7 days before the dispute and that the dispute has resolved. So M2 resumes at 7 days."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P02","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S04","S06"],"rationale":"S04 requires resumption from the prior elapsed value, not a restart. With 7 prior days (S06), a restart at zero is contradicted."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P03","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S01","S02","S06"],"rationale":"S01 makes a purchase order a payment requirement. S02 states that signed acceptance does not replace the purchase order. S06 states M2 has no purchase order. The stated requirement is therefore unmet, so M2 is not eligible for payment."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P04","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S03"],"rationale":"S03 explicitly states that Accounts Payable may register acceptance but may not sign it; only the named service owner may sign."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P05","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S05"],"rationale":"S05 explicitly states that a dispute on M2 does not pause M1."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P06","label":"contradicted","source_units":["S05"],"rationale":"S05 explicitly states that acceptance of M1 does not accept M2."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P07","label":"not_established","source_units":["S06"],"rationale":"S06 states that no payment due-day total is specified, so a 30-day total is neither established nor refuted."},{"id":"service-acceptance-P08","label":"not_established","source_units":["S06"],"rationale":"S06 states that no automatic reminder channel is specified. The sources do not require email, and this silence is not a prohibition."}]}