{
  "testedAt": "2026-10-10T09:57:35.251Z",
  "result": "passed",
  "checks": 31,
  "scope": "Synthetic records and pure calculations only; no real users, deployment, connector, external effects or live model evaluated.",
  "tests": [
    {
      "name": "Complete synthetic record is eligible for human review, never authorized",
      "status": "eligible_for_review",
      "expected": "eligible_for_review"
    },
    {
      "name": "Prohibited applicability cannot be offset by good metrics",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Changed action invalidates the scoped evidence",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Old system version cannot be reused",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Expired evidence does not pass",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Future observation does not pass",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Unreviewed timing study remains unknown",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Reviewer acknowledgement omits actuator delay and cannot pass",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Human-only oversight cannot cover a subsecond window",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Fast automatic protection still requires retrospective evidence",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Timed protection plus retrospective records can be reviewed",
      "status": "eligible_for_review",
      "expected": "eligible_for_review"
    },
    {
      "name": "Late automated protection is inadequate",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Reviewer overload holds the assessment",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "No stop function is a failed requirement in this profile",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Stop alone does not replace an intervention function",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Missing safe-state qualification remains unknown",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "High accuracy cannot cancel poor completeness",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Missing freshness is not a passing average",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Absent bias evidence cannot be assumed fair",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Clear cohort disparity holds the assessment",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Small cohorts remain unknown despite equal observed rates",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Uncertainty across the threshold requires review",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Repeated trajectory steps cannot be passed off as independent cases",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Zero denominator is never a fairness pass",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "A claimed percentage without its denominator is insufficient",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Duplicate conflicting metric records remain unknown",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Non-finite duration cannot pass",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Evidence from another scenario is held",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Unknown future format is rejected",
      "status": "hold",
      "expected": "hold"
    },
    {
      "name": "Absent profile",
      "status": "insufficient_evidence",
      "expected": "insufficient_evidence"
    },
    {
      "name": "Impossible binomial counts rejected",
      "status": "throws",
      "expected": "throws"
    }
  ],
  "baseline": {
    "status": "eligible_for_review",
    "checks": [
      {
        "id": "scope-caseId",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Scope binding matches."
      },
      {
        "id": "scope-systemVersion",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Scope binding matches."
      },
      {
        "id": "scope-scenarioId",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Scope binding matches."
      },
      {
        "id": "scope-actionClaimDigest",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Scope binding matches."
      },
      {
        "id": "scope-purpose",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Scope binding matches."
      },
      {
        "id": "applicability",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "A scoped applicability record is present; its legal correctness is not decided here."
      },
      {
        "id": "timing",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Supplied complete-loop timing fits the declared window; measured operating envelope still needs qualification."
      },
      {
        "id": "workload",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Supplied load is within the declared tested envelope."
      },
      {
        "id": "interventions",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "A safe-state qualification record is present; a revocation acknowledgement alone is insufficient."
      },
      {
        "id": "data-accuracy",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Dimension compared with its declared criterion; good dimensions do not cancel failed ones."
      },
      {
        "id": "data-completeness",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Dimension compared with its declared criterion; good dimensions do not cancel failed ones."
      },
      {
        "id": "data-freshness",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Dimension compared with its declared criterion; good dimensions do not cancel failed ones."
      },
      {
        "id": "bias-completion-quality",
        "status": "pass",
        "reason": "Comparison satisfies the configured conservative screen; this is not a fairness conclusion."
      }
    ],
    "metrics": {
      "totalInterventionMs": 48000,
      "reactionWindowMs": 120000,
      "comparisons": [
        {
          "id": "completion-quality",
          "gap": 0.0020000000000000018,
          "descriptiveEnvelope": [
            0,
            0.010627762450977185
          ],
          "method": "Envelope from separate 95% Wilson intervals; not a calibrated simultaneous confidence interval for the gap."
        }
      ]
    },
    "authority": "Research evidence screen only; no execution authorization or conformity decision."
  }
}